Why In News?
The Lok Sabha passed the Taxation and Other Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026, amending the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 to enable a future Merchant Discount Rate (MDR) on select high-value UPI transactions.
What is UPI?
Unified Payments Interface (UPI) is a real-time payment system enabling instant fund transfers between bank accounts via mobile devices, launched in 2016.
The National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) operates and governs UPI, and now also chairs the "UPI and Services Steering Committee" tasked with deciding on any future MDR.
UPI enables immediate, 24x7 fund transfers, unlike traditional banking transfer mechanisms with processing delays.
Interoperable payment system: Works across different banks and payment apps (PhonePe, Google Pay, Paytm, etc.), a key feature distinguishing it from closed-loop wallet systems.
Significance of UPI
Digital financial inclusion: UPI has become the backbone of India's digital payments ecosystem, extending formal financial access to small merchants and first-time digital users.
Low-cost payments: Since 2020's zero-MDR policy, UPI has offered cost-free digital transactions, driving mass adoption across income segments and geographies.
Formalisation of the economy: By bringing cash transactions into a digital, traceable format, UPI supports India's broader financial formalisation agenda.
Support for small businesses: Even street vendors and small shopkeepers now widely accept UPI payments, aided by government incentive schemes for low-value transactions.
Growth of digital commerce: UPI's massive transaction volumes underpin the rapid expansion of India's e-commerce and digital commerce sectors.
Scale of the network: In June 2026, UPI processed a total of 22.72 billion transactions worth ₹28.92 lakh crore, maintaining an average of 757 million daily transactions.
-
About 50% of the world's digital transactions are conducted by UPI platform with over 250 billion annual transactions worth US$3.4 trillion.
-
UPI is officially operationalised in 10 countries: Singapore, United Arab Emirates (UAE), Bhutan, Nepal, Sri Lanka, France, Mauritius, Qatar, Cambodia, Greece
What is UPI Commercialisation?
It is the process of introducing a revenue-generating fee structure — primarily via Merchant Discount Rate (MDR) — into what has so far been a zero-cost payment network.
-
Merchant Discount Rate is a fee charged to merchants (not consumers) by banks and payment service providers for processing digital transactions; UPI's MDR was fully waived in January 2020.
Payment Service Provider revenue: Under the zero-MDR regime, banks, NPCI, and fintechs earn no direct transaction revenue, a model the government has called financially unsustainable long-term.
Sustainability of payment infrastructure: The government argued that "exponential transaction volumes demand continuous upgrades" in cybersecurity, fraud prevention, and digital infrastructure, which a purely subsidy-dependent model cannot indefinitely support.
High-value transaction pricing: The proposed model targets only merchant transactions above ₹2,000, at a 0.25%-0.5% rate, excluding person-to-person transfers and the vast majority of small merchant transactions.
Why is Commercialisation Being Debated?
Rising infrastructure costs: Handling billions of transactions monthly requires continuous technology upgrades, which the zero-revenue model struggles to fund sustainably.
Need for sustainable revenue: The government stated the network requires a "self-sustaining revenue model" to encourage competition and attract corporate investment, rather than remaining wholly dependent on state subsidies.
Investment in cybersecurity: Growing transaction volumes and value increase the stakes of fraud and cyberattacks, requiring dedicated, sustained investment that a revenue-generating model could better support.
Innovation in payment technology: Proponents argue revenue stream could incentivise continued innovation among banks and fintech players, rather than relying solely on government-funded incentives.
Financial sustainability of payment firms: Industry voices, including the Payments Council of India, have argued that government subsidy compensation for zero-MDR has been "appropriated by banks," leaving fintech players under-compensated for their role in the ecosystem.
|
|
Arguments In Favour of Commercialisation |
Arguments Against Commercialisation |
|
Financial Sustainability |
Self-funding model: A targeted Merchant Discount Rate (MDR) reduces long-term reliance on annual government budget allocations. |
Higher merchant costs: Even a modest 0.25%–0.5% fee reverses the zero-cost promise that drove mass adoption. |
|
Market & Investment |
Private capital injection: Visible revenue potential attracts more private capital and healthy market competition. |
Burden on small businesses: Future expansions of fee thresholds could severely hurt small merchants on thin margins. |
|
Innovation & Tech |
Rapid innovation: Direct revenue incentives encourage banks and fintechs to aggressively develop advanced features. |
Erosion of inclusion: Reintroducing fees risks breaking the consumer trust built over years of free access. |
|
Security Infrastructure |
Stronger cybersecurity: Predictable revenue streams fund dedicated fraud-prevention tools better than shifting subsidy cycles. |
Risk of cash reversal: Charges on transactions over ₹2,000 might incentivize merchants to demand cash, slowing digitization. |
|
Fiscal / State Role |
Reduced subsidy burden: Eases the state's fiscal commitment (like the ₹1,500 cr incentive scheme for low-value transfers). |
Public good philosophy: Critics argue UPI should be funded entirely by the state as public infrastructure, like roads. |
Way Forward
Keep small-value transactions free: Preserve the zero-MDR guarantee for consumer transactions and small merchants, as the government has explicitly committed, to protect financial inclusion.
Target high-value transactions: Restrict any MDR strictly to merchant transactions above a defined threshold (reportedly ₹2,000), ensuring the burden falls only on larger, better-resourced businesses.
Transparent pricing: Ensure the NPCI-led UPI and Services Steering Committee's decisions on MDR rates and thresholds are made through transparent, published, and consultative processes.
Protect small merchants: Continue and expand incentive schemes — like the ₹1,500 crore low-value transaction incentive — to offset any residual cost pressure on vulnerable merchant segments.
Strengthen competition: Use any new revenue stream to encourage broader participation and innovation among banks and fintechs, rather than entrenching existing dominant players.
Reinvest revenue in payment infrastructure: Ensure MDR proceeds are channelled back into cybersecurity, fraud prevention, and system upgrades, fulfilling the government's stated rationale for the reform.
Conclusion
The government's carefully calibrated approach — free for consumers, targeted fees only on high-value merchant transactions — attempts to reconcile UPI's identity as public infrastructure with the fiscal reality that zero-revenue systems cannot scale indefinitely without sustainable funding.
Source: LIVEMINT
|
PRACTICE QUESTION Q. Consider the following statements regarding the proposed changes to UPI charges in 2026:
Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 and 3 only (b) 2 only (c) 1, 2 and 3 (d) 3 only Answer: (a) 1 and 3 only Explanation: Statement 1 is correct: The Taxation and Other Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026 explicitly amends Section 10A of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007. This removes the rigid statutory zero-MDR mandate and acts as an enabling provision for future frameworks. Statement 2 is incorrect: The bill does not directly impose a Merchant Discount Rate (MDR) or fix a threshold. Instead, it empowers the Central Government and the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) led "UPI and Services Steering Committee" to decide on and notify specific threshold-based MDR caps at a future date. Statement 3 is correct: The Ministry of Finance clarified that all person-to-person (P2P) transfers and routine consumer transactions will remain completely free under the new framework. |